Cryptocurrency public chains, as the core infrastructure of blockchain technology, exhibit diverse development and evolution patterns. To better understand these patterns, we can classify public chain projects into two categories based on system evolution and technical positioning: one focuses on emergent development, which can be seen as a “life form,” while the other emphasizes technical functionality, following the logic of reductionist determinism.

I. The “Life” of Emergence: Adaptation and Evolution

This type of public chain project exhibits characteristics similar to biological evolutionary systems, relying on feedback mechanisms and displaying emergent phenomena. Emergence refers to the complex behaviors and patterns arising from the interactions between individual components of a system, which cannot be predicted solely by analyzing the properties of those components. This model shares similarities with Darwinian evolutionary theory, emphasizing the system’s adaptability and evolutionary capacity.‍

1. Proof-of-Work (PoW) and the Special Case of Bitcoin:‍

• ‍PoW is a consensus mechanism fundamentally based on resource competition and consumption. Miners secure the blockchain’s safety and consistency by solving complex mathematical problems to obtain bookkeeping rights.‍
• BTC is the typical representative of the PoW mechanism and the pioneer of the cryptocurrency field. However, Bitcoin’s success is not solely due to the PoW mechanism itself. More importantly, Bitcoin has constructed a unique narrative structure that includes core concepts such as decentralization, scarcity, and censorship resistance. These ideas have created strong network effects and value consensus, attracting a large number of users, developers, and investors, thus endowing Bitcoin with robust “vitality.”
• In contrast, other PoW-based projects that lack similar narrative support or significant technical innovation may face development limitations due to weaker network effects and insufficient community support. These projects are often seen as “forks” of Bitcoin and generally exhibit weaker vitality.‍

2. Emergent Development Beyond PoW:

• ‍The GEB Project refers to an homage to or inspiration from the book Gödel, Escher, Bach (GEB), which explores concepts like self-reference, recursion, and emergence—ideas deeply connected to intelligence, consciousness, and life.
• In the cryptocurrency space, some projects also explore Satoshi Nakamoto’s design techniques, attempting to construct new intelligent life models. These projects may draw on ideas from GEB, using complex algorithms and mechanism designs to achieve system self-evolution and intelligent emergence. They aim to transcend traditional blockchain tools and explore more life-like and intelligent cryptocurrency systems.
• In the non-PoW field, some public chain projects are also exploring emergent development paths. These projects typically incorporate specific feedback loops and adaptive mechanisms to simulate the self-optimization and evolution of biological systems.

II. The “Tools” of Reductionist Determinism: Technology and Efficiency‍

Another category of public chain projects focuses more on technical implementation and functionality. They are based on Newtonian reductionism and deterministic thinking, emphasizing consensus consistency and predictability. Reductionism posits that a complex system can be understood by breaking it down into smaller components and that the system’s overall behavior can be predicted by analyzing these parts.‍

1. Consensus Mechanisms and Technical Tools:‍

• ‍BFT and PoS are common consensus mechanisms used in these public chain projects. These mechanisms aim to improve blockchain efficiency, scalability, and security while reducing energy consumption.
• Projects such as Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, and EOS can be seen as representatives of this technical tool approach. They have conducted extensive technical innovations in areas such as smart contracts, transaction speed, and cross-chain interoperability, striving to build more powerful and efficient blockchain infrastructure.
• These projects typically emphasize the deterministic nature of their technological roadmaps and their ability to address blockchain’s technical challenges. Their goal is to provide developers and users with reliable, efficient tools to support the development and operation of various decentralized applications (DApps).
  

2. Commercial-Oriented Blockchain Platforms:

• Additionally, some blockchain platforms are commercially oriented, such as BNB Chain, Base, and TRON (TRX). These platforms focus more on business applications and ecosystem development.

• They often collaborate with specific industries or businesses to launch a variety of commercial blockchain products and services, including decentralized exchanges (DEXs), stablecoins, and payment systems.
• The goal of these platforms is to promote the commercialization of blockchain technology and build a thriving blockchain ecosystem.

III. Conclusion: Understanding the Diversity of Public Chain Projects

In summary, cryptocurrency public chain projects can be categorized by their evolutionary models and technical positioning into “life form” projects focused on emergent development and “tool” projects emphasizing technical determinism:

‍“Life Form” Projects:

• Emphasize system adaptability, evolutionary capacity, and emergence.
• Aim to build self-organizing and self-optimizing systems with unpredictable and innovative development paths.

“Tool” Projects:

• Focus on technical implementation and functionality, emphasizing consistency, predictability, and efficiency.
• Strive to build robust and efficient blockchain infrastructure to provide reliable tools for developers and users.

Understanding these two categories helps us grasp the diversity of public chain projects and their developmental trajectories.

‍