In Turing’s 1936 classic model, the Turing Machine is defined as a formal system that handles computable problems. It performs deterministic computation through finite steps and explicit rules. However, in his 1938 doctoral dissertation, Turing introduced a more powerful model: the Oracle Turing Machine, designed to address decision problems within formal systems that cannot be determined through internal reasoning.
We can distinguish two types of problems:
The perception of the real world is, in essence, not pure computation, but a process involving ambiguity and probabilistic judgment—this closely aligns with how an Oracle Turing Machine operates:
Perceiving Reality = Decision Problem ≠ Computable Problem
We cannot rely solely on logical deduction within a formal system to determine “whether this is an apple,” because this judgment involves semantics, experience, inductive reasoning over fuzzy boundaries, and must depend on some form of intuitive decision-making mechanism.
Take the simple act of “counting two apples” as an example. This behavior involves two levels of cognitive operations:
Therefore, the human brain can be viewed as a composite system, containing:
The deductive computation within a Turing Machine is always limited by the boundaries defined by its formal system. To break through these boundaries, we must leverage the external decision capability of the Oracle Turing Machine:
From internal “computability” to external “decidability”
This is precisely what differentiates human intelligence from ordinary algorithms: Humans possess a “oracle structure” that allows them to step outside formal systems and make judgments of meaning.