Introduction
Between Gödel’s incompleteness theorems and Turing’s theory of computability lies a profound logical corridor—one that connects the computational boundaries of formal systems with the judgment limits of real-world systems. This article explores Bitcoin’s UTXO model from the perspective of Turing Machines and Oracle Machines, aiming to unify “decidability problems” and the “P/NP problem” into a broader logical framework through the concept of ordinals.
In his 1936 paper, Turing introduced the Turing Machine—the first clearly defined model of computability. It formalized the description of all “effectively computable” processes. In this sense:
Turing Machines handle problems that are fully computable within formal systems.
In his 1938 doctoral dissertation, Turing introduced the concept of ordinals and the Oracle Turing Machine. Unlike ordinary Turing Machines, Oracle Machines can query an external “oracle” to resolve problems that standard Turing Machines cannot decide.
Oracle Machines deal with how to relatively determine truth across systems.
Bitcoin’s UTXO model can be viewed as a formal system at the Turing Machine level—its operation is fully computable. However, issues in the consensus mechanism like double-spend judgment and longest-chain induction fall into the realm of non-formal-system problems. These involve comparisons across nodes and historical states and require higher-level decision mechanisms.
Thus, the Bitcoin system is a composite operational structure of both Turing and Oracle Machines:
In classical complexity theory, the P/NP problem is a longstanding open question. This article proposes a unified perspective: the P/NP problem is essentially a complexity version of the decidability problem across systems.
Ordinals provide the logical scaffolding for complexity stratification, unifying decidability and complexity assessments.
Why did Gödel study set theory? His goal was to unify reality and logic—constructing the foundations of the world through logically definable “sets.”
For example: The set {apple, chestnut, banana} has a cardinality of 3. But logical determinations within the system—like whether it’s consumable or whether it follows an order—require ordinal support.
By distinguishing between Turing Machines and Oracle Machines, this article unifies computational problems, decision problems, consensus problems, and complexity problems within a single logical structure. This not only helps us understand the operational boundaries of real systems like Bitcoin, but also provides a new lens to re-examine the P/NP question, Gödel’s ordinals, and the limits of formal systems.